Evaluation
Q: Explain comprehensively (+/-) how your first MOT was applied to your mountain bike trip (link a POT that you used and effects on exercise physiology).
The first method of training I applied to the mountain bike trip was Continuous. Continuous is training that starts and doesn’t stop until you have completed you physical action. Running, Biking, Swimming etc. I first used this method during a cycle session to kick off my training. This enable me to get back into the rhythm of cycling considering I hadn’t done it for while. In my training I used this method more than any of the others too make sure my endurance was the level that I thought it should be at. During the mountain bike trip the continuous effort was a lot harder than I expected I though that the training I had done would be enough to be able to do well in during the trips assessment. However the training I had done seemed to fell not enough during the assessment. The principle of training that best fit the continuous method was the time principle. The time principle is one of the most important principles of training to use during the trainings not just continuous. Time was extremely important on the assessment as well since it was a time trailed assessment. I did like the sports psychologies I used during my training which helped me be able to apply them on the trip as well to push myself through it even after realising my training hadn’t quite prepared me enough.
After the assessment I felt like I hadn’t pushed myself enough because I wasn’t sure on the first part of the track which was a struggle to get up and by trying to use everything to quickly it then made me not be able to do the rest of the track as fast as I could since I had used such a high intensity level at the start and had to regain any endurance I had left. I feel like I did enough continuous training but still could have done more to get my endurance a level higher so I could of better coped but not enough of the other trainings which was a negative as I used this method for most trainings where it felt like I could keep going and pushing myself along by using sports psychs. My time wasn’t what I thought it would be but I got the mark I was aiming for considering how hard it actually was after I had done the assessment.
The effects of the assessment and trip as a whole was slightly drastic in the Latic acid build up that I had by the end during the trip home. Cramp had been the number one issue during the whole trip. My muscles felt fine but the Latic acid build up was too much and it started to give me some serious cramp to the point where I had to get off and rest for a bit while riding with the advanced group. By the end of the assessment I had progressed into serious cramp during the later bike sessions. The effect of this was that I had used through all three energy systems and was biking on the aerobic system while starting to feel the effects of the Latic acid build up in my quadriceps and hamstrings. Because of the duration of continuous fitness the was required during the trip the quadriceps and hamstrings where the two main muscles working the hardest and had serious gains after the trip. The calves and gastrocnemius where the next two muscles but they weren’t working anywhere near as hard and where fine for the whole trip. The day after the trip all my muscles where feeling fine and didn’t have any soreness but where still cramping up a bit. Which makes me feel like the amount of lactic acid build up and the extreme load the quadriceps had was the only two factors that where seriously effected.
Positives of Continuous Training
– Continuous training was a good testing to better improve the performance of endurance as it would require a long duration of time I order to use the method of continuous training properly which is where the principle of trying helps the method. It allowed me to test myself to see where was at on different types of endurance levels for things like running and cycling which required different intensity levels from certain muscles while still including basically all of the same muscles. Which is another positive as it tests different muscles at different levels so you can see where the most improving needs to be done.
Negatives of Continuous training.
– Continuous training is good for endurance but not much else. It doesn’t give you the muscle build and intensity levels that other trainings can which are big parts of the fitness required during the trip.
Q: Explain comprehensively (+/-) how your second MOT was applied to your mountain bike trip (link a POT that you used and effects on exercise physiology).
The second method of training I applied to the mountain bike trip was fartlek. Fartlek is training involves continuous activity, with bursts of speed added in. It combines continuous training and interval training. Short random bursts of high intensity exercise alternate with medium or low intensity segments to no particular pattern. I first used this method during a session of mixed running and sprinting at different intensity levels.
The effects of exercise physiology in fartlek training is that all three enegry systems are used and includes short term effects on the body like increased heart rate, sweat, red faced, heavy breathing etch the long term effects is that your body adapts to these conditions when training and gets used to this so it can continue to perform at a high level. As all thre energy systems are used the aerobic system is used the most because this training is for long durations that works at different intensity levels on different muscles depending on the training being done.
Positives of Fartlek
– Trains muscle and body for changing in between different levels of intensity at an instant. Uses both endurance and high intensity at the same time. Enables the body to adapt to working at differnet levels and still being able to endure long fatiguing activities.
Negatives of Fartlek
– Requires specific kinds of training and some already good endurance levels to be able to get benefits from the training.
Q: Explain comprehensively (+/-) how your third MOT was applied to your mountain bike trip (link a POT that you used and effects on exercise physiology).
The third method of training I applied to the mountain bike trip was interval training. Interval training is when you use very-high intensity for short durations of time. During the mountain bike trip there were stages that involved fast pace cycling and then simply not pedalling during didn’t downhill. I felt like the interval training wasn’t the best training to get the best benefits for the assessment but was still good to train as it built the strength in the leg muscles better than any other training aside from resistance which both help the muscles better cope under high intensity and prevent injury.
Interval training helped during the trip but not a lot. It did have positives and was used on the trip during the parts of the track where you would ride downhill and then have to do a very vertical uphill climb at high intensity levels which is what the interval part of the assessment was and basically the only parts that it helped aside from muscle building for strength.
Positives of interval training
– Builds muscle and trains body for quick high intensity bursts.
Negatives of interval training
– Doesn’t help the endurance level of fitness.
Q: What changes would you make to the MOTS and POTS you have applied? If not what worked well and why?
I would make the method of training class performed instead of independently because the training would then be much more efficient and organised and would have more benefits for the students when it comes to performing the actual assessment. The methods of training and principles of training are all good and work well but have a teacher setup the lesson and involve the whole class in the training session then they will actually benefit from the training. They worked well and did help on the trip but some training sessions where not used to their full potential in order to make the actual mountain trip assessment easier so that each student could get a better mark.